US

The Latest Pro-Choice Argument Is That Women Choosing To Have Abortions Are ‘Exiting The Workplace,’ Not Being Forced To Do ‘Gestational Work’

SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

Rachel Stoltzfoos Staff Reporter

A woman who chooses to kill her unborn child is “exiting the workplace” of a violent slaveholder, according to a new argument for abortion pushed by an abortion activist from Ireland.

Sophie Lewis wants to cast the debate in “new” terms in order to “win radically” as an increasing number of U.S. states pass laws to severely restrict abortion. (Alabama recently passed a law effectively banning the procedure in the state.) Lewis describes the procedure as an “acceptable” form of killing by a woman who doesn’t want to do the “gestational work” imposed on her by a fetus.

“In the past, the strategies that our side has tended to use have included a kind of ceding of ground to our enemies,” Lewis says in an interview with Verso Books, which recently published her book, “Full Surrogacy Now, Feminism Against Family.”

“We tend to say that abortion is indeed very bad, but — Or we say, ‘Luckily its’ not killing. Luckily, it’s just a healthcare right. We have very little to use at the moment when it comes to abortion, and I’m interested in winning radically.”

Eleanor Crossey Malone displays an abortion pill packet after taking a pill as abortion rights campaign group ROSA, Reproductive Rights Against Oppression, Sexism and Austerity distribute abortion pills from a touring bus on May 31, 2018 in Belfast, Northern Ireland. Flouting Northern Irish governmental laws which forbid the use of abortion pills the group are also protesting outside offices belonging to the main political parties in the province.(Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)

Eleanor Crossey Malone displays an abortion pill packet after taking a pill as abortion rights campaign group ROSA, Reproductive Rights Against Oppression, Sexism and Austerity distribute abortion pills from a touring bus on May 31, 2018 in Belfast, Northern Ireland. (Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)

“And I wonder if we could think about defending abortion as a right to stop doing gestational work,” she continues. “Abortion is in my opinion — and I recognize how controversial this is — a form of killing. It is a form of killing that we need to be able to defend.” (RELATED: PBS Tackles Abortion Debate In Frontline Documentary — And Gets It Right)

As Lewis notes, few abortion activists describe the procedure as killing, instead opting to downplay the humanity of the fetus by describing abortion as “terminating a pregnancy” or removing a “clump of cells.” Pro-life activists say that clump of cells is a human life from the moment of conception. Lewis equates accepting the killing of an unborn child to accepting the death of an adult — both involve knowing when to “let go,” and exist on opposite ends of a spectrum of “making and unmaking each other.” (RELATED: We Edited A New York Times Op-Ed On Abortion So It Reads Correctly)

“I am not interested in where a human life starts to exist,” Lewis says. “I see the forms of making and unmaking each other as sort of continuous processes. The other end of the spectrum is the process of learning how to die well, and hold each other, and let each other go, at the end of our lives as well as the beginning.”

“But looking at the biology of this kind of hemochorial placentation helps me think about the violence that, innocently, a fetus metes out vis a vis a gestata,” she continues. “And that violence is an unacceptable violence for someone who doesn’t want to do gestational work. The violence that that gestator metes out to essentially go on strike or exit that workplace is an acceptable violence.”

Follow Rachel Stoltzfoos on Twitter